Japanese men are losing interest in matrimony, often because of the enormous financial demands of marriage and family. But fewer births could mean Japan’s population will be a fifth smaller by mid-century.
The birthrate in the United States is falling too. Millennials are having fewer babies because they’re not financially ready due the Great Recession and its aftershocks. But despite fewer births than deaths, the US population is still projected to grow because of immigration. Japan is disinterested in immigration, however.
Yet, a bachelor tax would fail for several reasons:
- People respond best to natural incentives. Social engineering usually has unintended consequences.
- Japanese men will still remain unmarried unless the tax is much more expensive than the cost of raising a family.
- Even if the tax incentivizes Japanese men to marry, this doesn’t mean Japanese women will become more marriage minded.
- Even if more people do marry, this doesn’t mean they’ll have more babies (at least not enough to stop the population decline).
And there’s the rub. Ultimately it’s women, not men, who have babies. So a bachelor tax fails to directly target the correct group.